Events
Local Events
Past Events
Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issues
Information
Career / Volunteer Opportunities
Chapter Information
History
Bylaws
Constitution
Spring 2008 Meeting
Held on March 13, 2008 at the Wyndham Glenview Suites.
The Program consisted of three presentations:
Biographical Background
When testing several hypotheses simultaneously, the challenge is to combine
them into a multiple test procedure that controls the familywise error rate,
or overall α. One useful approach is the closure method. We develop a
powerful statistical test for use with the closure method for testing
co-primary endpoints in clinical trials, when there is a common effect
direction and the test statistics are normally distributed. We show that the
simple sum test is maximin, then alter its rejection region to make it
consonant, i.e., to guarantee that rejection of the intersection hypothesis
implies that at least one endpoint is significant. This new test has greater
power and retains the maximin property. Our application to PROactive, a
CV-outcome trial of patients with Type 2 DM and CV disease history, shows
how efficacy for one key endpoint could have been established. Taking the
primary and secondary endpoints as co-primary, in a closed test design, both
the simple sum test and the consonant sum test yield p-values below the
allocated α.
Abstract
Dr. Carlos Vallarino has been working in the
pharmaceutical industry for the past 7 years. Following 3 years in Phase
II/III clinical trials at Eli Lilly and Pharmacia, he joined Takeda's
Outcomes Research group in 2003, where the emphasis is on the analysis of
Phase IV outcomes from claims databases. He recently transferred to the
Epidemiology group, where he has expanded his responsibilities to include
the statistical analysis of safety data, particularly early signal
detection. Dr. Vallarino holds a Bachelor's degree in Mathematics, Economics
and Statistics from the State University of New York at Buffalo, Master's
and Ph.D. degrees in Statistics from the University of California at
Berkeley.
Biographical Background
Abstract
As evidence aggregates showing that DNA
sequence itself is the determinant factor in nucleosome positioning in
Eukaryotic cells, statistical modeling of chromatin sequence remains
exceedingly challenging. The challenges arise as a consequence of the fact
that the signals intrinsic in nucleosome sequences are very weak; in
addition knowledge on the linker DNAs, which are interwoven with nucleosome
motifs in chromatin fiber, is very limited. In particular the linker length,
which determines the orientation of adjacent nucleosomes, is of fundamental
importance in understanding chromatin structure. We investigate the linker
length distribution of two Eukaryotic species including yeast and human
using two novel methods: a Fourier analysis of dinucleotide frequency in the
extended region of nucleosome core particles and a duration Hidden Markov
Model (DHMM) for dinucleosome sequences. Both methods conclude that the
linker length distribution is not uniform but periodic. The DHMM method
further shows that the linker length prefers a form 10n + d0,
where d0
= 5 bp for yeast as opposed to 10 bp for human overwhelmingly.
Biographical Background
Dr. Viswanath Devanarayan received
his Ph.D. in Statistics from NC State, 1996. He has 12 years of experience
in the pharmaceutical industry, spanning Lilly, Merck and Abbott. His
primary areas of focus included drug discovery applications, assay
methodologies, clinical pharmacology, experimental medicine, and biomarker
discovery and evaluations in both pre-clinical and clinical applications.
In all of these topics, he has given numerous invited presentations at
various international meetings. As part of some committees within PhRMA,
AAPS, AACR, SBS, etc., he has coauthored with relevant subject-matter
experts from other companies, FDA, academia and NIH, in important position
papers related to immunogenicity, high throughput screening, biomarker
method validation and clinical biomarker qualification.
Abstract
The quality of statistical thinking
and methods used is a major determinant in the successful discovery and
evaluation of biomarkers. Data normalization and transformation methods can
greatly impact the analysis. False discovery rates (q-values) and miss
rates are critical for setting meaningful thresholds for identification.
While it is important to analyze each marker individually (e.g., ANOVA), it
is also important to keep in mind that a marker useless on its own may be
great in a composite. The use of multivariate modeling methods that
account for the interactions, similarity and diversity of the markers is
essential for the identification of composite biomarkers. Examples of such
methods include generalized additive models, shrunken centroids, random
forests, kNN clustering, etc. The predictive utility of these composite
biomarkers should be assessed carefully via appropriate internal
cross-validation methods, and further tested in independent cohorts
(external validation) to expand and qualify their use in early drug
development. In addition, the statistical evaluation of validation data
from biomarker analytical platforms can have a major impact on the utility
of such platforms. This short presentation will provide some background on
biomarker research and an understanding of all these statistical
considerations with illustrations and graphs.
Last updated: 03/31/09 by: Clint Lovell
Northeastern Illinois Chapter
American Statistical Association
